News Review and Commentary
LEADING HEAD TEACHER ATTACKS 'QUICK-FIX CULTURE' THAT ROBS CHILDREN OF PATIENCE TO LEARN NEW SKILLS

LEADING HEAD TEACHER ATTACKS 'QUICK-FIX CULTURE' THAT ROBS CHILDREN OF PATIENCE TO LEARN NEW SKILLS

  Daily Mail 14 May  The "quick-fix culture" is damaging children's ability to master sport and music, a leading headmaster warned yesterday.  Jonathan Milton of Westminster Abbey Choir School said youngsters increasingly lacked the patience to acquire skills suc » Read More

10 JUNE ;IFS; LEVEL PLAYING FIELD? THE IMPLICATIONS OF SCHOOL FUNDING 10 JUNE ;IFS; LEVEL PLAYING FIELD? THE IMPLICATIONS OF SCHOOL FUNDING

  10 Jun 2008 13:00 to 14:30   Conference Venue: Institute for Fiscal Studies [see map] Price: No charge Calendar: Download iCal file                   The IFS will be » Read More

9 JUNE; LAUNCH OF  'BY ACCIDENT OR DESIGN' IS OUR SYSTEM OF POST 16 PROVISION FIT FOR PURPOSE 9 JUNE; LAUNCH OF 'BY ACCIDENT OR DESIGN' IS OUR SYSTEM OF POST 16 PROVISION FIT FOR PURPOSE

 "By accident or design - Is our system of post 16 provision fit for purpose?"   Mick Fletcher and Adrian Perry and   "Learning matters - making the 14-19 reforms work for learners?, by Geoff Stanton. Monday 9th June 2008  Time:2.00 - 4.30pm » Read More

'SHAMELESS' PARENTS NOT TEACHING SKILLS

5/14/2008 8:27:00 AM

 

Daily Telegraph 14 May

 A generation of young Britons are growing up in "shameless" families where parents lack the basic skills to raise their children, the Conservatives will warn today.  Chris Grayling, the shadow work and pensions secretary, will claim that in some parts of the country there is no culture of parents instilling discipline and respect in their offspring. He will tell a London think tank that multiple generations of teenage parents mean that some of today's children have no exposure to elder relatives with traditional experience of parenting. The result, he argues, is irresponsible parents whose children run wild and grow up without the skills and attitudes to better themselves. DT

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

EDUCATION IN ENGLISH SCHOOLS IS 'FATALLY DISTORTED' SAYS NIALL FERGUSON

5/14/2008 6:52:00 AM

 

The Times 13 May

 The English education system has become “fatally distorted” by an unhealthy fixation with an anachronistic examinations system that ill prepares students for university, a leading academic has warned. Niall Ferguson, professor of history at Harvard University in the US and a senior research fellow at Oxford University, said that teenagers in England were handicapped by an over-emphasis on timed examinations and by being forced to chose between arts and science subjects too early. Professor Ferguson blamed “the tyranny of A levels” for forcing teenagers into narrowly defined paths of study and called for them to be replaced with a baccalaureate style qualification covering a broad mix of arts and science subjects and involving an element of independent research rather than assessment purely by examinations. Teaching in America, where teenagers and undergraduates study a much broader curriculum, had made him realised that “what we are doing here is wrong,” Professor Ferguson said. At Harvard, students start by taking eight courses spanning science, culture and ethics. “I can think of few worst preparations for Harvard than a typical English secondary education,” he said. Technological advances in the world meant that it was necessary for all students to have a broad based education and to continue maths after the age of 16, he said. But too often the A level system did not allow this. Times 

Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

LETTERS; TIMES; THE STORY OF OUR LAND IS NOT SIMPLE — OR OURS

5/14/2008 7:22:00 AM

 

Letters; The Times 14 May

 

Brighton College history lessons

 Sir, I was disappointed to read that the headmaster of Brighton College has joined the clamour to give his pupils a “narrative of history they so relish” in order to imbue them with a “sense of their history” (report, May 10). While a cross-curricular course along the lines he suggests has some merit, there is a divergence between his aim of imbuing his children with a sense of pride and patriotism and teaching them about their history. Without any counterbalance, any telling of the dark side of our history, we end up with the sanitised H. E. Marshall view of our past as endorsed by Civitas, and, worse, run the danger of becoming part of the debate that treats history in its extremities as some sort of political football kicked shamelessly between traditionalists, who treat history as irrefutable fact, and those who use it to promote a social agenda. Of course our students need a proper context to view their world and they can benefit enormously from a chronological framework, but history is not taught to boost national morale but to try to give a balanced view of what happened in the past from what we know today in order to better understand our world and to make us better citizens. While students need a proper mix of knowledge, they need also to learn the skills of discrimination and analysis and the opportunity to view history as contested knowledge until proven otherwise. Learning one’s own history has nothing to do with being ashamed or embarrassed; it is about seeing one’s place in the world and looking at what happened in the past as objectively as possible. In learning about Winston Churchill (as they most certainly should), perhaps a good starting point would be a discussion of his statement: “History shall be kind to me for I intend to write it.”

Peter Tait
Headmaster,
Sherborne Preparatory School, Sherborne, Dorset  

Sir, The plan by the headmaster of Brighton College to teach “The Story of Our Land” is highly encouraging. It is time to end the left-wing/liberal conspiracy over the past 50 years which has inculcated, especially in our schools, a false sense of shame, guilt and need for apology for our imperial history. Sadly, we cannot expect leadership from our Prime Minister in this respect. Mr Brown has been recorded as saying, “the main challenge of modern Britishness is to put behind us all that mixture of pride and shame about our imperial past and change the subject”. We must all hope that other wise headmasters will teach our children that the history of our contribution to the peace and development of the world smacks much more of pride than shame.  

Alan Forward
Sherborne, Dorset

  Sir, While the headmaster of Brighton College is right to draw attention to shortcomings of the Key Stage 3 curriculum (report, May 10 ), he also shows a lack of understanding of what is currently being taught in schools and a worrying insularity in his view of education. Many schools, including mine, place great attention in their Key Stage 3 curriculum on local geography, local and British history and a study of faiths, including Christianity, which are strongly represented in the UK. However, for very sound educational reasons, most schools also draw examples and case studies from all over the world to illustrate core concepts. Many young people cease to study history, geography or religious studies after 14. If their background for the previous three years has been in “The Story of Our Land”, we will be educating a young generation to be largely ignorant at 14, and in their later lives, of the world which lies outside our small island and, hence, unfit to play a meaningful role in today’s global economy and society. The Government gives us far too many soundbites and publicity-seeking initiatives. Please, as headteachers and schools, can we focus on sound-footed, educational wisdom.  

Nicholas D. B. Dorey
Headmaster,
Bethany School Goudhurst, Kent  

Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

CAMBRIDGE TO DROP FOREIGN LANGUAGE REQUIREMENT

5/14/2008 6:53:00 AM

 

The Times 14 May

 The University of Cambridge is to drop its requirement that prospective students should speak a foreign language, to avoid discriminating against applicants from state schools. The university has always demanded that candidates – whether arts or science – had qualifications in English, a foreign language, maths or science, and two other subjects. But the requirement for a modern foreign language has been blamed for penalising pupils from state schools. most of which no longer make it a compulsory subject after the age of 14. A university spokesman said that the change had made a significant impact on the qualifications of candidates. He said: “In 2000, 80 per cent of school students overall took a foreign language at GCSE. The proportion has now fallen to below 50 per cent. “While independent schools are generally maintaining their language provision, in only 17 per cent of state schools is there now a requirement to study a language after the age of 14.” The new entry requirement will be introduced next year. Times 

FE/HE/ Skills

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

STUDENTS CLAIM SURVEY DISHONESTY

5/14/2008 6:54:00 AM

  

 

BBC 13 May

 Students from a range of universities are claiming they are being pressed to make falsely enthusiastic responses to an official satisfaction survey. Staff at Kingston University were recorded telling students to falsify their ratings in the government-backed annual National Student Survey. In response, hundreds of students have e-mailed the BBC News website claiming this is a more widespread problem. The higher education funding council says the survey is not invalidated. The National Student Survey, set up by the funding council (Hefce), provides a league table of student satisfaction - which is intended to be useful for young people choosing a university. Endorsed by the government and funded by the taxpayer, it is part of the process of quality assurance in higher education. But an audio recording made at Kingston University revealed that staff were instructing students how to respond to the survey - and using it as a way of promoting a positive image rather than an honest assessment.           BBC

FE/HE/ Skills

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

REDRESSING THE BALANCE

5/13/2008 8:37:00 AM

Fiona Millar; The Guardian 13 May


The education bill brings us one step closer to making schools fairer, says Fiona Millar .The past few weeks have seen newspaper accounts of a father throwing himself in front of a train, a family being hounded by surveillance tactics usually reserved for terrorists, and a mother handing her child over to the guardianship of a relative in a different area. These are not reports of the latest soap opera, simply the latest examples of the extreme stress that can arise from parental choice colliding with the rationing of school places.  The subject just won't go away, will it? Today the third reading of the education and skills bill brings new measures designed to make the system fairer. They aren't exactly being shouted from the rooftops, possibly due to the public mauling that followed Ed Balls's naming and shaming of schools that were flouting the new admissions code. There was something slightly hypocritical and cowardly about his decision to point the finger at tiny Jewish primary schools requiring a financial contribution (shocking as that may be) while publicly endorsing the overt selection of the 164 grammar schools by announcing that their heads would get yet more money to "support" the local secondary moderns, whose problems they help to create. However, the subsequent actions, incorporated in today's amendments to the education bill, are significant. They mark a further erosion of the pre-2006 act government position that there is no such thing as covert social selection (which meant even the London Oratory's interviews were blindly defended on faith grounds), and a strengthening of the schools adjudicator and the code he upholds. Once the bill is passed, local authorities will be obliged to report all admission arrangements in their areas to the adjudicator's office, which can then decide if they fall foul of the code.Guardian 

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

NEWS IN BRIEF: NATIONAL TESTS 'TURN PUPILS OFF LEARNING'

5/13/2008 6:51:00 AM

 

The Times 13 May

 School standards should be monitored by the random testing of a sample of pupils, MPs demand today. In a powerful attack on the system of national curriculum testing in schools, the Children Schools and Families Select Committee said that the current arrangements encouraged a narrow curriculum that turned students off learning and increased their anxiety. The damning report comes as 1.2 million 11 and 14-year-olds across England take their national curriculum tests in maths, English and science. The MPs say that drilling children to focus on “test tactics” leads to shallow learning and short-term retention of knowledge, and denies pupils a rounded education, leaving them unprepared for university and employment. Times

Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

SCHOOLS' TESTING REGIME 'LEAVES PUPILS UNPREPARED FOR WORK'

5/13/2008 8:04:00 AM

 

The Independent; 13 May 

 Teaching to national curriculum tests is ruining pupils' futures and leaving them unprepared for the world of work, says a report released today by a group of MPs. The Labour-dominated Commons Select Committee for Children, Schools and Families warns that the "inappropriate focus" by teachers on test results could rob pupils of a well-balanced education. "We received substantial evidence that teaching to the test, to an extent which narrows the curriculum and puts sustained learning at risk, is widespread," the MPs state. "The way that many teachers have responded to the Government's approach to accountability has meant that test results are pursued at the expense of a rounded education for children. "One serious consequence of teaching to the test is that it tends to lead to shallow learning and short-term retention of knowledge." The report adds: "In the worst cases, teachers may resort to dull and boring methods of teaching, using the looming threat of examinations to motivate pupils rather than inspiring them to learn." The result of this has been a "disproportionate focus" on the core subjects of English, maths and science and "those aspects of these subjects which are likely to be tested in an examination" than all others.Independent

Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

TOO MUCH POWER?

5/13/2008 8:39:00 AM

 

Francis Beckett; The Guardian  13 May


A single academy sponsor is controlling millions of pounds of public assets. Is this right, asks Francis Beckett .What is the most powerful organisation in secondary education? A good case can be made for the United Church Schools Trust. The biggest academy sponsor (through its subsidiary, the United Learning Trust), with 13 already set up and several more on the way, the UCST also owns 11 private fee-charging schools and employs 1,700 people. It controls hundreds of millions of pounds' worth of public assets and property (it will not say exactly how much). It has spent hundreds of millions of pounds of public money building its academies, and the taxpayer will pay it hundreds of millions more every year to use them.  It runs its 24 schools in a more centralised way than any local education authority has ever done. Key management decisions, which in other schools are taken by the head or governors, are taken at its corporate headquarters in the Northamptonshire village of Titchmarsh. All its academies have websites in the same ULT house style, and the ULT's address is on each home page. It has a very corporate feel. This, says the chief executive, Sir Ewan Harper, "promotes our family of schools and academies". He points out that each school has its own uniform, and heads and local governing bodies still take "critical" decisions.Guardian 

Secondary

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

HOW PLUMBING KILLED OFF PILATES

5/13/2008 8:40:00 AM

   

Peter Kingston ;The Guardian 13 May

 The cut in funding for adult education has affected all socio-economic groups, but worst hit are manual workers. Peter Kingston reports  So, it was not a blip. Last year's slight downturn in the numbers of adults doing some sort of learning can now be seen as the start of a more serious slide. The 1 percentage point dip from the previous year's total was described as "well within the margin of error" by Alan Tuckett, director of Niace (the National Institute for Adult Continuing Education), when he produced its 2007 annual survey charting participation in adult learning. This year's survey - out today - shows a drop of a further three points, which is a "statistically significant" shift, he says. It looks more like the start of an avalanche. The official records published by the Learning and Skills Council make clear that in the two years after the government withdrew funding, 1.4 million people left publicly funded adult education. Ministers declare that the money at their disposal is better used in boosting the numbers of adults with level 2 qualifications (the equivalent of five GCSEs) even if many of them are not learning new skills but having their existing capabilities assessed and certificated. There were hopes in Whitehall that the 1.4 million would not abandon their learning but find alternative sources. It is now clear that not all of them by any means have managed this.Guardian

FE/HE/ Skills

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

News Review and Commentary

Click on the links below for the latest, in-depth education news review and commentary.


Calendar
<<  May 2008  >>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678
View news items in large calendar

Daily News

Archive