News Review and Commentary

POLICE INVESTIGATE SCHOOL 'SUPERHEAD' FOR FRAUD

5/5/2008 10:19:00 AM

 

Daily Telegraph 5 May

 A "superhead", who was made a dame for turning round a failing school, is being investigated by police over allegations of fraud. Maureen Brennan is alleged to have fiddled records to make the school appear more successful than it was. Officers are examining accusations that registers were altered to show pupils in school when they were not. Police would not comment, but one possibility for a fraud inquiry is that the figures might have been altered to exploit the fact that schools are funded per child. Another is that higher attendance results in financial bonuses for a school. Sources close to Dame Maureen described the claims as "ridiculous". The West Midlands Police investigation follows a report by Dudley council, which found "serious problems in recording attendance" at Hillcrest School and Community College in Netherton. When Dame Maureen took over in 2000, the school was on the special measures list. But three years later, Ofsted inspectors gave her a glowing report, calling Hillcrest "one of the most outstanding schools in the country". Telegraph

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

TIMES LETTERS; TEACHERS SHOULD NOT BE CONDEMNED

5/5/2008 8:56:00 AM

TEACHERS SHOULD NOT BE CONDEMNED

Letters; The Times 5 May

 The claim that there are up to 24,000 failing teachers is unfounded and unacceptableSir, The claim that there are up to 24,000 failing teachers (report, May 2) is unfounded and unacceptable; and the attempt by Keith Bartley, chief executive of the General Teaching Council for England (GTCE), to create a witch-hunt by publicly condemning teachers without a shred of hard evidence is outrageous. To bemoan the fact that the GTCE has only had 46 cases of incompetence and then to draw the conclusion that incompetent teachers are not being reported reeks of the regulator of the teaching profession touting for extra business. Teachers are already monitored and inspected to within an inch of their lives, and all maintained schools are required to have a policy and procedure in place to deal with capability issues which can end in dismissal for a teacher. All the statistics show that the vast majority of teachers are doing a good job and are delivering improvements in outcomes for pupils in line with the Government’s aspirations. We should be celebrating the hard work, dedication and demonstrable achievements of teachers rather than lining up to undermine their status, competence and professionalism.  

Chris Keates General Secretary, NASUWT 

 Sir, Having taught in both state and private sectors for more than 35 years, and served as pastoral governor of a comprehensive school, I’ve seen many situations in which the problem was not so much the teacher but the lack of authority invested in school governance itself. When a 14-year-old lad marches into ones classroom, throws his satchel on the floor and proclaims that he “bloody well does not want to be in school, and f***ing well does not intend to do any work” then this involves the whole ethos of the school, and its leadership and management. I hear at first hand of London comprehensives where youngsters cannot hear teachers because of the general chatter and the widespread use of mobiles; of course students may well see little point to being in school. A considerable percentage of teachers find that they cannot cope on their own — nor should they have to.  

Brian Stowe Great Malvern, Worcs 

 Sir, I would urge readers to take the figures on the number of incompetent teachers with a very large pinch of salt. They are more to do with the reluctance of many teachers to deliver their lessons in the totally prescribed and doctrinal manner demanded by Ofsted inspectors. A colleague of mine (a very good teacher, I might add) was told her lesson was unsatisfactory because she failed to smile at a pupil who walked in late and told another pupil that she thought he was lazy. One of the principal reasons for disaffection in teachers is having to jump through ever-changing Ofsted hoops that deliver little or no benefit to the pupils.  

Peter Holmes Alcester, Warwickshire

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

TEACHERS 'SHOULD FACE TOUGH NEW TESTS TO WEED OUT INCOMPETENTS'

5/5/2008 9:04:00 AM

 

The Independent 5 May

 Tough new tests to remove thousands of incompetent teachers from the classroom are being demanded by an influential think-tank. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) warns in a report published today that poor secondary school teachers can make the difference between a pass and a fail in exams. Research conducted by the left-of-centre think-tank shows that the difference between being taught by an excellent teacher and a bad one can be more than just one grade. For example, it could turn a potential C grade pass – recognised by ministers as the benchmark for success – into a D grade or worse.The report goes on to reveal that – while the teaching profession is still not attracting top performing graduates – only one in 100 of those who sign on for teacher training courses fail to qualify.Figures show that UK schools recruit from the top 30 per cent of graduates while countries whose education systems are at the top of international league tables such as Finland and South Korea attract from the top 10 per cent and 5 per cent respectively. The report recommends introducing a new nationally set written test for all those on initial teacher training courses – testing their literacy, numeracy and cognitive skills. In addition, all applicants should face psychometric tests to assess their personality and whether they would be suitable for teaching.Julia Margo, IPPR's associate director, said: "Teaching is rightly seen as a profession that people aspire to work in. But there are still a large number of ineffective teachers and they make the difference between children passing or failing."Independent 

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

TEACHERS THREATEN TO BOYCOTT TESTS

TEACHERS THREATEN TO BOYCOTT TESTS

5/5/2008 8:42:00 AM

 

The Times 5 May

 Teachers are mobilising parental support for a big campaign against national tests for children at the ages of 7, 11 and 14. Mick Brookes, the general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), put the Government on notice yesterday that it faced “trouble ahead” if it did not listen to teaching professionals and parents who believe that the tests distort children’s education and put them off learning. Speaking at the union’s annual conference in Liverpool, Mr Brookes refused to rule out a boycott of the tests, which he described as “expensive nonsense”. “If there is still this complete obstinacy we will have to consider our options by November this year,” he said. Mr Brookes pointed out that there was near-universal opposition to the system of national testing in England. He said that he was gathering support from other unions, from the National Confederation of Parent Teacher Associations and other experts to take on the Government over the issue.  Ministers have plans to replace the tests in 2011 with single-level testing, which is being tried at the moment. Times

Lead Story | General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

SCHOOL HEADS ACCUSE PARENTS OF DUMPING CHILDREN ON SCHOOLS

5/5/2008 8:43:00 AM

   

The Times 5 May

 Parents are abdicating responsibility for their children and dumping them at school for up to ten hours a day, a teachers’ leader said yesterday. Mick Brookes, the general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said that schools were increasingly being expected to take over childcaring responsibilities from parents who could not cope. “I can give you chapter and verse on parents who do abdicate responsibility and dump their children early at school and are late in picking them up,” he told the union’s annual conference in Liverpool. He was immediately taken to task by Beverley Hughes, the Schools Minister, who said that such parents were in a small minority and that perhaps the Government had a duty to support those parents who wanted to return to work by ensuring that childcare was available. Times

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

LEADING ARTICLE: HEADS SHOULD ROLL

5/5/2008 9:14:00 AM

 

Leader; Independent 5 May

 Ofsted inspections are to blame for deterring gifted teachers from applying for headships. Says who? So says the National Association of Head Teachers. The NAHT released the findings yesterday at its annual conference. The same research found that the vast majority of members thought inspections increased vulnerability and insecurity. Oh yes, and heads especially don't like spot-inspections. Does anyone?Ofsted responded that it did not necessarily accept the findings, given that the NAHT research was based on a small sample and not compiled by a recognised polling organisation. But let's be generous and take the heads at their word, but also offer some home truths. Head teachers are among those who have benefited most from the public service pay rises of recent years. Heads of large schools, including schools outside London, have salaries that compare well with professional salaries in the private sector. We won't even mention the hours and the holidays: we know – because they say so at every turn – that the workload leaves them no time for relaxation. That a little (very little) insecurity is now built in to the careers of those who have reached the pinnacle of their profession, and that heads are judged by outside assessors on the quality and standards of the schools they run, is no more than any professional should expect. In some sectors, the validation comes from paying customers. For schools, it comes from parents and from Ofsted.There are many things wrong with our state schools: the frustrations of the national curriculum and the tyranny of league tables, to name but two. Schools in some inner city areas present special difficulties. But parents and taxpayers have a right to know how schools are doing. Head teachers should do less complaining and get on with their crucial job.Independent

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

'BAD TEACHERS LETTING DOWN CHILDREN'

5/5/2008 9:35:00 AM

 

Daily Telegraph 5 May

 Thousands of children are underachieving in class because of poor teachers, according to a report published today. The study by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), a Left-wing think-tank, criticised the Government's failure to root out unsuitable candidates for the job. Researchers said only one in 100 students currently fail teacher training courses and just a quarter are regularly monitored in the classroom. Julia Margo, the think-tank's associate director, said: "There are still a large number of ineffective teachers and they make the difference between children passing and failing. Improving the recruitment and professional development of teachers would enable schools to improve or replace poor staff." The report follows a warning last week by the General Teaching Council for England (GTC) that as many as 24,000 poor teachers may work in the state system as heads recycle staff between schools rather than launch bureaucratic competency procedures. The GTC, which is the official regulator, stated that urgent action was needed to retrain teachers who had "more bad days than good". Only 46 teachers from a workforce of almost 500,000 have been referred to the GTC and judged incompetent since 2001. DT

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

LETTER ;SCHOOLS FOR MUSLIMS

5/5/2008 10:18:00 AM

SCHOOLS FOR MUSLIMS



Letter; The Guardian 5 May

 Yasmin Alibhai-Brown of British Muslims for Secular Democracy (Report, May 2) criticises the efforts of some British Muslims to establish faith schools and asks: "How is it that Sikhs and Hindus can live in democracy but not Muslims?" The government subsidises thousands of Catholic and Anglican faith schools. Over 50% of Jewish children attend Jewish faith schools. In recent years the government has also - contrary to the impression given by Alibhai-Brown - approved funding for Sikh and Hindu faith schools. Whatever your position on the merits of faith-based schools, it is clearly discriminatory and unjust to help fund those of other faith communities and then complain about some British Muslim parents seeking equal treatment under the law.

Inayat Bunglawala
Assistant secretary general, Muslim Council of Britain

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

TOUGHER A-LEVEL 'TO WIDEN GAP BETWEEN SCHOOLS'

5/5/2008 9:39:00 AM

 

Daily Telegraph 5 May

 New tough A-levels will widen the gulf between state and independent schools, official forecasts claim. Almost a quarter of pupils at fee-paying schools are expected to gain at least one top A* grade when they are awarded in 2010. At comprehensives, the figure is expected to be just nine per cent. Grammar school pupils will perform even better. The analysis is by exams regulator, the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. It comes as schools prepare to begin teaching the new courses from September. Students will face tougher essay-style questions and the new A* grade will be introduced for the first time for top performers. This will enable universities to differentiate between bright and average candidates after a huge increase in the number of students awarded As in the last 20 years. But it is feared the move may undermine the Government's drive to get more state school students into the top universities.DT 

Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

RICHER FAMILIES ‘WILL GAIN MORE’ FROM STUDENT CASH FOR UNIVERSITY

5/5/2008 8:44:00 AM

     

The Times 5 May

 A £165 million package of student support due to be introduced in September will disproportionately benefit undergraduates from middle-class families while providing only minimal support for the poor, the Conservatives claim. The means-tested student maintenance grant, which covers living costs but not fees, will be available to students whose parents earn up to £60,000. Previously the cap was £39,305. Families on £25,000, up from the previous threshold of £18,360, will receive the full grant of £2,835. The reforms, designed to attract more working-class students into higher education, should mean an extra 100,000 will have help to pay their way through university. But a new analysis of government data by David Willetts, the Shadow Universities Secretary, has found that 90 per cent of the extra spending will initially go to families in higher socioeconomic groups. Times

FE/HE/ Skills

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

News Review and Commentary

Click on the links below for the latest, in-depth education news review and commentary.


Calendar
View news items in large calendar

Daily News

Archive