5/27/2008 7:29:00 AM
Estelle Morris; The Guardian 27 May
It is very difficult to have a sensible debate about testing. The House of Commons select committee report on the subject, published earlier this month, is one of the best summaries of the issues that I've seen. Yet it was predictable that some would dismiss it as another attack on the standards agenda. There was a time when the dividing lines in the testing debate were quite simply whether we should test children or not. That battle has been fought and won. Tests are an integral part of school life. Teachers use the data to raise standards further, and it is unimaginable that parents shouldn't have the right to know how their children and the schools they attend are performing. As Mick Brookes, the general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, told the committee, "Nobody in our association wants a return to the 1970s when you did not know what the school up the road was doing, let alone a school at the other end of the country." Yet, in its response to the report, the government risks giving the impression that anyone who questions any part of the existing testing regime wants to turn back the clock. For the most part, their evidence to the committee rested on linking the rise in standards to the present form of the testing regime, implying that by fiddling with one you threaten the other. So, let's agree that any attempt to weaken or undermine the tests or to make schools less accountable would be a backward step. However, defending this position must not become an excuse not to engage in the debate that the committee has started. It's report reads as though ministers live in a parallel universe to some of the other witnesses. One says children are over-tested, creativity has been squeezed out of schools, and modern children are the most stressed generation ever. The other says we only test children three times in 11 years, millions of pounds have been put into the arts, and the quality of childhood has never been better.Guardian
Curriculum / Quality Assurance
E-mail a friend |
del.icio.us| Bookmark|
Permalink |
Comments
(0) |
Post RSS