News Review and Commentary

THEY DON'T HAVE TO F%*K YOU UP

7/15/2008 7:41:00 AM

 

The Guardian 15 July

 New research offers insights into what helps some disadvantaged children to do well. Wendy Berliner reports .On the face of it, Luke Burton is a shining example of how someone from an economically disadvantaged background can succeed in education. His mum at one time was working in a chip shop and doing three other jobs to make ends meet, he didn't go to a high achieving school and, by his own admission, he messed around in class more than he should have done.

Yet at 24 he is training to be an actuary with a big firm in London, has a maths degree from Oxford and an MA - the first graduate in his family. Why is it that some young people seem inoculated against less advantaged beginnings while others don't? New UK and US studies are pointing the finger ever more clearly at particular kinds of parenting and home environments that do the trick. But the big money still doesn't go into parenting education, despite research that proves it can be an enormous force for change. Yet stark facts suggest more finance for parenting education would be money well spent.

 

Attainment gap

 Sizeable gaps in school readiness exist in the UK despite universal nursery education for three- and four-year-olds; in the US half the eventual gap in attainment between children from less advantaged and more advantaged homes exists when the child starts school. Here a bright but poor child can be overtaken in test results by a less bright child from an affluent home by age seven. In England, poor children among the top performers in tests at 11 are much more likely to have lost that critical advantage by the time they take their GCSEs. All the money Labour has poured into the education system since 1997 has failed to increase the tiny numbers of young people from the lowest socio-economic groups getting into university. So why do Burton and others like him do so well?Guardian 

General

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

WATCHDOG HITS OUT AT TEST CHAOS

WATCHDOG HITS OUT AT TEST CHAOS

7/15/2008 7:16:00 AM

   

FT 15 July

 The head of England's qualifications watchdog has painted a picture of chaos in exam marking for key tests taken by all state school 11- and 14-year-olds. Ken Boston, chief executive of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, told MPs that markers had been given wrong information about the location and time of training, unmarked scripts had been incorrectly returned to schools, and markers had experienced delays in getting papers.The marking of the exams - Key Stage Two and Key Stage Three - has been outsourced to ETS, the education company. Mr Boston was speaking before the children, schools and families select committee of the House of Commons, to which he had been summoned to explain this year's exam problems.Key Two Stage Two results will be published today, one week late. Most Key Stage Three results will be later this week.

FT

  

SCHOOL TEST RESULTS FIASCO MAY RESULT IN EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE BEING SACKED

 

The Times 15 July

 The fiasco over delayed school test results affecting millions of children could result in the company responsible being sacked and forced to pay back tens of millions of pounds. Ken Boston, the head of the exams regulator, said after an emergency hearing of MPs yesterday, that the testing system was under stress and needed modernising. He added that problems were unlikely to be resolved in time for next year’s tests. Thousands of parents are expected to challenge the results, encouraged by the adverse publicity surrounding this year’s exams. This week Mick Brookes, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, said schools were reporting “all kinds of problems” with marking, and told parents that they should not rely on SATs [national curriculum test] results as the sole indicator of their child’s progress. He urged schools to give parents teachers’ assessments of pupils, as well as SATs results, and advised that these be treated as “provisional”. Yesterday Dr Boston, the chief executive of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, claimed that the company, ETS, had failed to respond to 10,000 e-mails. His officials were forced to set up and pay for a call centre to cope with complaints to the company.

Times

  

WE SHOULD HAVE LEARNT FROM US EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE EXPERIENCE

 

Alexandra Frean:The Times July 15

 The marking of this year’s national curriculum tests for 11 to 14-year-olds has, by any measure, been a shambles. But it would be a mistake to regard the problem as a new one. Head teachers know only too well that every year there are problems of one kind of another with the marking of the 9.5 million papers sat by 1.2 million students. Results have been published late before, most notably in 1998 and again in 2004, when the head of the National Assessment Agency resigned after a delay of three months in getting out accurate Key Stage 3 English results. Many of the problems can be laid squarely at door of ETS Europe, the contractor that took over marking the papers this year on a £150 million, five-year contract. Problems began to emerge last October when some senior markers resigned because of new approaches to the way that the Key Stage tests would be marked. By early spring, markers were reporting a series of administrative problems, including ETS failing to register their contract details, difficulties in contacting the company by telephone or e-mail, delays in training and the failure of a system for selecting English markers. Once children had taken the exams there were delays in the papers being sent to markers, some scripts went astray and many markers received the wrong batches of scripts. In the past, marking was administered by Edexcel, one of the three main examination boards in England. When ETS took over the marking this year it embraced new technology, using online training and verification for markers and for recording results. In so doing it discarded years of experience and loyalty built up among the workforce of markers, who are mostly part-time teachers trying to earn some extra holiday money (the pay is £3.50 per script, plus a 50p administration fee).

Times

  

EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE: AMERICAN MARKERS HAD EARLIER PROBLEMS

 

The Times 15 July

 Educational Testing Service (ETS) Europe is being paid £165 million of public money over five years to mark key stage tests for schools. This is its first year in the role and it has already run into problems, prompting complaints from head teachers, MPs and the exams regulator over delays in returning test results. Other apparent problems have involved its software, helpline and face-to-face training. It took over the marking of 9.5 million papers from the exam board Edexcel. ETS Europe is part of ETS, a huge non-profit making American organisation with extensive test administration experience in 180 countries. In the US it is responsible for running SATs tests, but recently lost the contract for the Graduate Management Admission Test, worth a reported £100 million. It has a controversial history of alleged mistakes in its marking of American test papers. These included inaccurate scoring in an exam used to license teachers in 2004, resulting in more than 4,000 people failing when they should have been given a pass. In 2006 ETS announced a year-long delay in introducing revised exams for graduates. A spokeswoman for the Princeton Review, an education company, said at the time: “ETS has never met a deadline they have set. We are not surprised at all.” An ETS spokesman said recently that he had no knowledge of any previous problems in other countries. However, that ETS was given an important contract was heavily criticised. Nick Gibb, the Tory schools spokesman, said: “There was a clear lack of due diligence taken when awarding this contract.” Times 

Lead Story | Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE TEST FIASCO

7/15/2008 7:43:00 AM

   

Mike Baker; The Guardian 15 July


 You know something is serious when the Commons schools select committee summons Ken Boston, the head of the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, for an emergency session. And, indeed, the hold-ups to the publication of the national curriculum tests - not to mention the concerns over the quality of marking - are certainly serious. There are now lengthy delays in the reporting of results to parents and, for pupils transferring from primary level, to secondary schools. What a fiasco.
There had been warnings that the new marking contractor, ETS Europe, was experiencing difficulties. Yet there was no official acknowledgement of this until just four days before the results were due. In June, I received an email from a key stage 3 science marker who, despite frequent attempts, had been unable to submit his marks using the ETS software. He wrote that phone calls and emails to ETS went unheeded, and that his contacts with other markers suggested the problem was widespread. Indeed, just getting them to answer the phone was hard enough, and promises to call back weren't honoured. This was all the more frustrating since ETS had asked for early submission of completed mark lists and had even promised cash bonuses to those who did so. Ofqual has launched an inquiry, headed by Lord Sutherland, but why did it take so long for the alarm signals to be heard? Or did the authorities know something was amiss but remain quiet, hoping that somehow ETS would still meet the deadline? Presumably, the inquiry will answer these questions as well as find out exactly what went wrong. Earlier correspondence between the National Assessment Agency (NAA), the QCA and the government shows the QCA was confident that the changes in marking practice proposed by ETS would not cause delays. Guardian 

Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

BACK TO SCHOOL

7/15/2008 7:15:00 AM

 

FT 15 July

 The decision by Ofsted, the government’s schools inspectorate, to force a senior pharmaceutical executive to resign from its board smacks of political cowardice. If the state is serious about tapping outside expertise to improve performance, it needs to rethink its approach.Paul Blackburn, financial controller at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), was recruited to a part-time voluntary post because of his financial expertise. A single newspaper article’s criticisms of GSK – some questionable, none new and none linked to him personally – triggered demands for his immediate departure.Long-established guidelines from the government’s Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments establish a solid framework for such nominees: selflessness, integrity, objectivity, accountability, openness, honesty and leadership. None of these appear to have been breached in Mr Blackburn’s case.Companies should not be represented on government bodies where there is any conflict. For example, a medicines manufacturer should never be appointed to an agency assessing clinical trials, drug approvals or reimbursement. Yet no such tension exists with Ofsted.FT

General | Curriculum / Quality Assurance

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

NOT PUPPETS, BUT THINKING ACTORS

7/15/2008 7:42:00 AM

 

The Guardian 15 July


As would-be thespians show their talents, Lyn Gardner spots deepening rifts in drama education. Do some students do too much study and not enough treading the boards?  Tonight and tomorrow, 44 young actors will step into the spotlight for what could be the most important three minutes of their lives. All have been handpicked from the graduating year of the leading conservatoire drama schools that are members of the Conference of Drama Schools (CDS). Each of the 22 men and women will have less than 180 seconds on stage to perform and impress a panel of casting directors and leading actors in a competition run by Spotlight, the UK's largest actors' agency. These young actors are already winners. A report from the CDS last year highlighted the fact that it is twice as hard to get into a leading drama school as it is to get into Oxbridge, with the ratio of applicants to places averaging seven to one. These young people have not only beaten off the competition to win their places, but are now deemed by their schools and teachers to be the cream of the crop. But how well prepared are these young actors to succeed in a profession in which 80% earn less than £10,000 a year, and is three years at drama school still the best way to enter that profession? It's a question worth asking when it increasingly seems that the entirely untrained can just stroll up for an audition and get a shot at stardom in a reality casting TV show. As the theatre producer Richard Jordan says wearily: "Even among drama school students, when you ask people what they'd like to do after graduation, some answer that they want to be famous. It's a big problem in the industry that those reality shows make it seem as if being an actor is easy, and that you don't need the training. But if you're going to survive, then being properly trained is crucial, not just in acting technique but also in the techniques of getting a job, building a career and surviving in the longer term. Lots of young actors are no longer in the profession just six months or a year after leaving training. They may be very good actors, but they haven't got the skills to survive the harsh realities. Drama schools need to teach those skills too."Guardian 

Curriculum / Quality Assurance | FE/HE/ Skills

E-mail a friend | del.icio.us| Bookmark| Permalink | Comments (0) | Post RSSRSS comment feed

News Review and Commentary

Click on the links below for the latest, in-depth education news review and commentary.


Calendar
View news items in large calendar

Daily News

Archive