7/4/2008 7:16:00 AM
Jane Owen; FT 4 July
The final round of emotional public school balls and dinners to wave off 18-year-olds and their parents is now taking place. It is a tearful moment for many, particularly those of us who have paid a full term’s fees for a term substantially reduced by “study leave”.
Study leave is the increasingly popular public school habit of letting, or in some cases encouraging, pupils to go home to revise for public exams. Barely had my trembling hand signed the cheque for nearly £9,000 for Offspring Number One’s final term than the study leave question arose.
The theory is that pupils apply themselves to their books at home with the same discipline as they do at school. Given the myriad distractions at home, the chances of ONO being able to revise thoroughly were roughly equal to Alistair Darling’s chance of reversing the credit crunch, and so I canvassed the school to keep ONO. This was met with stout resistance from the school and ONO – and a hint of outrage from both that I should be so unfair as to want ONO to stay.
While I have the greatest respect for the academic rigour, standards and energy of ONO’s outstanding boarding school, I take exception to a system that does not insist on a child being at school at this crucial final stage. Nor does it keep pupils at school after the exams until the end of term to enjoy sport, music, drama and all the other extra-curricular activities that take second place during exams.
Apart from anything else, this time is needed so that parents can continue to labour for the school fees.
FT
Independent/ Private Sector
E-mail a friend |
del.icio.us| Bookmark|
Permalink |
Comments
(0) |
Post RSS